Playing with big dogs

Posted: May 25th, 2009 | Author: Ivan Rečević | Filed under: root | Tags: , , , , , | No Comments »
Dogs Playing Cards, A Friend In Need - Cassius Marcellus Coolidge

Dogs Playin Cards, A Friend In Need - Cassius Marcellus Coolidge

Would they let you play with old dogs in their own game? I bet not.

Through numerous personal encounters or meetings with people significantly older than myself, it seems that discussion about (real) money is just out of question.

Old dogs speak about costs of living, but ignore youngsters possibility to talk/discuss serious money.

The game

Game is about high stakes, where your resources are on max and utilization is at its top. The dogs hold the cards and multiple aces. Coming to table means that you have something dogs really need.

The rules

In their world, dogs just have enough and everything is seen through money, which they hold. The rules revolve around dogs “elderly” right to manipulate and consume resources you desperately need. Calmly, you stand by the table and present the idea.

The bid

They really need your offer. Or they simply need amusement and are intrigued by idea. So, dogs are in need.

The risk

You play on the game of greed. You simply know what is necessary in means of financing, to support the idea. But, before placing the risk think of overheads and risk of some misfortune (sick days, change of team players). You have to include those. Then think about your greed vs. need of dogs. Greed wins over need, but with very elegant placement before dogs.

The moment of taboo

You just CAN NOT talk about money. Let me explain. It is God given right of elder dogs to discuss money. You can not. And that is pure fact.

If their need is strong they will swallow and you will win.

The outcome

Want to be top dog? Ignore yada-yada talk. Push your direction and show personality. If you do not stand up to yourself, dogs certainly wont.


Seize the opportunity to create the job you’ve always…

Posted: May 21st, 2009 | Author: Ivan Rečević | Filed under: root | Tags: , | No Comments »


Evolution & extinction

Posted: May 19th, 2009 | Author: Ivan Rečević | Filed under: root | Tags: , , , , | No Comments »
200905191726.jpg

History of media distribution and relevance

A good tour of the last 210 years of information with view of the next 10 years. Complete content is here.

What it means?

We notice in reality extinction of newspapers, even in regions which adopt trends slower (Eastern Europe). No one will be saved by miracle. The only way is evolve. Or really extinct.

Prophecy of marketing agencies, of quality measurement of delivered ads (performance of offline campaigns) will not come in next 5 years, is nonsense. We are able to measure, quantify and qualify best performing ad campaigns event according to ad slot reserved on TV. The Net just became one big mash-up and we can utilize it do offer previously unknown methods of marketing following and performance monitoring.

We do not speak of checking ratings, reach, price of reserved ad space, and everything else which stands for monitoring which is indirect measurement.

We are becoming involved and part of business, not just indirect observer.

We speak money baby. Perception of marketing is like this: being place where fancy looking guys and gals sit in trendy coffee shop trying to look busy and intelligent. This time is almost over (they will be there still, trying to sell imagination) but further more there will be more and more people doing exactly the same thing business in mind.

Previous marketing was based on just speak without results, making distance from operations and client partnership. Now, companies need to involve new form of marketing in order to survive digital economy and landscape.

How to live with age-spanning population?

Have you ever saw why and how 50 year old people are using computers and Internet devices?

They just HAVE to use it (sometimes need). Either, cause their job is pushing them to use, or kids going overseas that require communication, or plain interest (what can I find there?).

70 year old granny want to use Skype in order to find content otherwise unreachable to her. 60 year father needs computer to communicate with daughter going overseas.

It can be compared to fax machines: no one used them but companies purchased them in order to stay “modern”. When number of fax machines became significant and unavoidable, companies could not ignore those devices any more. It is just a piece of stationery.

Kids are using Internet and forms of informations generated in a way, that Internet savvy adults (i.e. us), can not comprehend.

We can notice that Social news and targeted content is coming our and theirs way, and other forms (i.e. TV, websites…) are loosing its drive.

Population segmentation is normal, but received content is reaching all ages. The way how people communicate with content is changing from day to day.

This realistic future is showing that we can not have monolithic organization or content delivery. Data offered must be mash-able.

How to live with relevance?

Are you relevant? I sure do try, with some fails to cover all aspects but really trying hard to.

In digital landscape, your identity or corporate image can be compromised with one angry person. This means that your or company relevance must be rock solid. Marketing and PR must live together and sometimes empty stories about “social responsibility” must became reality and constant part of organization culture.

There is no excuse, not to work on your public image. Digital landscape is offering just this. Rich content, open channel, audience really interested in you/company and loyal fan base.

Just be honest and deliver content and service.

Do I have to be celebrity?

This is the story of leaders and followers. Some people do not have the drive to be leaders and became followers, ’cause it is easier.

Responsibility of being leader is same as being celebrity. People do take attention on you and follow you just because they BELIEVE in You. Not being naive, people want to believe in something and you must offer something.

In order to be believable you must be honest or have something they attach to.

In landscape where, whistleblowers are wannabe celebrities, only way is to fight with honesty or great product/service.

This is why I do compare you with celebrity.

Where to sell? (Marketplace)

This is the time of niches. But niche is population of world with selected individuals that follows you. Even then this niche is measured by many thousands. You have the world. It’s just question what part of it.